Repository logo

Publication:
Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions

dc.contributor.authorArtinger, Florian
dc.contributor.authorGigerenzer, Gerd
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Perke
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-30T13:31:39Z
dc.date.available2026-10-30T13:31:39Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.description.abstractIn 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: an agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational. (JEL D11, D80, D90)
dc.identifier.citationArtinger, F. M., Gigerenzer, G., & Jacobs, P. (2022). Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(2), 598–635. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201396
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201396
dc.identifier.issn0022-0515
dc.identifier.issn2328-8175
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14938/1451
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Economic Association
dc.titleSatisficing: Integrating Two Traditions
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage635
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage598
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Economic Literature
oaire.citation.volume60
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8d381b66-0f36-4635-86c8-c6cdcb4f215b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8d381b66-0f36-4635-86c8-c6cdcb4f215b

Files